Screener
AAVM vs IVAL
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF vs Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
Key differences
- IVAL is significantly larger than AAVM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAVM follows a active selection strategy; IVAL uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAVM | IVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $207M |
| Since | 2017 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.79% | 2.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -34.71% | -46.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAVM and IVAL
Explore further