Screener
AAVM vs SAMT
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- AAVM costs 0.28% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than AAVM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAVM is classified as equity, while SAMT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- AAVM follows a active selection strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AAVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAVM | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $619M |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.79% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +46.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | +28.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -34.71% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAVM and SAMT
Explore further