Screener
ABFL vs KONG
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
ABFL is an equity ETF, while KONG is an alternative ETF. ABFL charges 0.49% a year and KONG 0.89%.
- ABFL is an equity fund, while KONG is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ABFL follows a active selection strategy; KONG uses option income.
- ABFL costs 0.40% less per year.
- ABFL is much larger than KONG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ABFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ABFL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ABFL | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $520M | $22M |
| Since | 2016 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.54% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.2% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.63% | 10.92% |
| Max drawdown | -34.95% | -19.98% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.