Screener
ABIG vs FLQL
Argent Large Cap ETF vs Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF
Key differences
- FLQL costs 0.34% less per year.
- FLQL is significantly larger than ABIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ABIG follows a active selection strategy; FLQL uses index tracking.
- FLQL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ABIG | FLQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.09% | 1.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.14% | 12.99% |
| Max drawdown | -13.70% | -33.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ABIG and FLQL
Explore further