Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ACES vs GKAT

ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF

ACES

ALPS Clean Energy ETF

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$145M

GKAT

Scharf Global Opportunity ETF

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$165M

Key differences

Both ACES and GKAT are equity ETFs. ACES charges 0.55% a year and GKAT 0.59%. The main difference: ACES follows a index tracking strategy; GKAT uses active selection.

  • ACES follows a index tracking strategy; GKAT uses active selection.
  • ACES covers North America; GKAT covers global markets.

Side-by-side comparison

ACESGKAT
Annual cost (TER)0.55%0.59%
Fund size (AUM)$145M$165M
Since20182014
Dividend yield0.54%0.45%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaglobal
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+57.2%N/A
CAGR 3Y-3.7%N/A
CAGR 5Y-10.5%N/A
Sharpe 3Y-0.04N/A
Volatility 1Y33.43%
Max drawdown-79.05%-10.41%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ACES and GKAT