Screener
ACWV vs XMLV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- ACWV is significantly larger than XMLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACWV covers global markets; XMLV covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, XMLV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACWV | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.3B | $750M |
| Since | 2011 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.05% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.75% | 10.30% |
| Max drawdown | -28.82% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACWV and XMLV
Explore further