Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

AMAX vs BALI

Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF

AMAX

Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF

Annual cost

1.36%

Fund size

$64M

BALI

iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.2B

Key differences

Both AMAX and BALI are alternative ETFs. AMAX charges 1.36% a year and BALI 0.35%. The main difference: BALI costs 1.01% less per year.

  • BALI costs 1.01% less per year.
  • BALI is much larger than AMAX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

AMAXBALI
Annual cost (TER)1.36%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$64M$1.2B
Since20092023
Dividend yield10.96%2.35%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth america
Strategyoption incomeoption income
CAGR 1Y+10.2%+24.7%
CAGR 3Y+8.5%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.50N/A
Volatility 1Y10.24%10.21%
Max drawdown-16.25%-16.65%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to AMAX and BALI