Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

AMID vs KONG

Argent Mid Cap ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF

AMID

Argent Mid Cap ETF

Annual cost

0.52%

Fund size

$105M

KONG

Formidable Fortress ETF

Annual cost

0.89%

Fund size

$22M

Key differences

AMID is an equity ETF, while KONG is an alternative ETF. AMID charges 0.52% a year and KONG 0.89%.

  • AMID is an equity fund, while KONG is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • AMID follows a active selection strategy; KONG uses option income.
  • AMID costs 0.37% less per year.
  • AMID is much larger than KONG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, AMID has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

AMIDKONG
Annual cost (TER)0.52%0.89%
Fund size (AUM)$105M$22M
Since20222021
Dividend yield0.35%0.36%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1Y+8.4%+6.0%
CAGR 3Y+12.9%+9.5%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.570.50
Volatility 1Y16.27%10.92%
Max drawdown-23.32%-19.98%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to AMID and KONG