Screener
ANEW vs AAXJ
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both ANEW and AAXJ are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and AAXJ 0.72%. The main difference: ANEW costs 0.27% less per year.
- ANEW costs 0.27% less per year.
- AAXJ is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $4.0B |
| Since | 2020 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.6% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.6% | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.48% | 21.53% |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -44.52% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.