Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ANEW vs EPP

ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF

ANEW

ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$8M

EPP

iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF

Annual cost

0.47%

Fund size

$2.1B

Key differences

Both ANEW and EPP are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and EPP 0.47%. The main difference: EPP is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

  • EPP is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, ANEW has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • EPP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ANEWEPP
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.47%
Fund size (AUM)$8M$2.1B
Since20202001
Dividend yield0.61%3.43%
Asset classequityequity
Regionasia pacific
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+3.5%+11.8%
CAGR 3Y+13.6%+12.4%
CAGR 5Y+3.6%+4.0%
Sharpe 3Y0.660.57
Volatility 1Y13.48%14.91%
Max drawdown-39.87%-39.30%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ANEW and EPP