Screener
ANEW vs EWJ
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Key differences
Both ANEW and EWJ are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and EWJ 0.49%. The main difference: EWJ is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EWJ is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EWJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $21.3B |
| Since | 2020 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +31.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.6% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.6% | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.48% | 19.86% |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -33.14% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.