Screener
ANEW vs IPAC
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both ANEW and IPAC are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and IPAC 0.09%. The main difference: IPAC costs 0.36% less per year.
- IPAC costs 0.36% less per year.
- IPAC is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IPAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IPAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2020 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.8% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 16.74% |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -31.00% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.