Screener
ANEW vs SCJ
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both ANEW and SCJ are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and SCJ 0.50%. The main difference: SCJ is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCJ is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, SCJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $245M |
| Since | 2020 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 2.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.6% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.6% | +7.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.48% | 16.19% |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -37.28% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.