Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

AOR vs EAOA

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF vs iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

AOR

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.5B

EAOA

iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$36M

Key differences

  • AOR is significantly larger than EAOA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AOR follows a active selection strategy; EAOA uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, EAOA has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

AOREAOA
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.18%
Fund size (AUM)$3.5B$36M
Since20082020
Dividend yield2.53%2.03%
Asset classmixed assetmixed asset
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+19.8%+24.4%
CAGR 3Y+14.4%+17.2%
CAGR 5Y+7.1%+8.7%
Sharpe 3Y1.111.10
Volatility 1Y8.47%10.80%
Max drawdown-22.95%-25.06%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to AOR and EAOA