Screener
APIE vs MCH
ActivePassive International Equity ETF vs Matthews China Active ETF
Key differences
- APIE costs 0.34% less per year.
- APIE is significantly larger than MCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- APIE covers global markets; MCH covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, APIE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| APIE | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $22M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.51% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.7% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +11.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.13% | 19.91% |
| Max drawdown | -15.94% | -40.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to APIE and MCH
Explore further