Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

APUE vs MEMX

ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

APUE

ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF

Active Passive Funds

Annual cost

0.31%

Fund size

$2.4B

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$45M

Key differences

  • APUE costs 0.48% less per year.
  • APUE is significantly larger than MEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • APUE covers north america markets; MEMX covers emerging markets.
  • Over the last 3 years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

APUEMEMX
Annual cost (TER)0.31%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$2.4B$45M
Since20232023
Dividend yield0.79%1.72%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+30.2%+62.2%
CAGR 3Y+22.9%+25.6%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.241.20
Volatility 1Y12.36%21.07%
Max drawdown-18.83%-19.27%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to APUE and MEMX