Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

APUE vs REMG

ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF vs Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF

APUE

ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF

Active Passive Funds

Annual cost

0.31%

Fund size

$2.4B

REMG

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Russell Investment Management Limited

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$95M

Key differences

  • APUE costs 0.33% less per year.
  • APUE is significantly larger than REMG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • APUE covers north america markets; REMG covers emerging markets.
  • APUE follows a active selection strategy; REMG uses index tracking.

Side-by-side comparison

APUEREMG
Annual cost (TER)0.31%0.64%
Fund size (AUM)$2.4B$95M
Since20232025
Dividend yield0.79%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+30.2%N/A
CAGR 3Y+22.9%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.24N/A
Volatility 1Y12.36%
Max drawdown-18.83%-14.13%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to APUE and REMG