Screener
ASCI vs SCZ
abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCZ costs 0.30% less per year.
- SCZ is significantly larger than ASCI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASCI covers global markets; SCZ covers global ex us.
- ASCI follows a active selection strategy; SCZ uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASCI | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $85M | $14.4B |
| Since | 2009 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 3.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.44% |
| Max drawdown | -11.22% | -41.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASCI and SCZ
Explore further