Screener
ASCI vs SMMD
abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF vs iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Key differences
- SMMD costs 0.55% less per year.
- SMMD is significantly larger than ASCI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASCI covers global markets; SMMD covers north america.
- ASCI follows a active selection strategy; SMMD uses index tracking.
- ASCI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASCI | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $85M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2009 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +36.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -11.22% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASCI and SMMD
Explore further