Screener
BCFN vs CLIX
Baron Financials ETF vs ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
Key differences
Both BCFN and CLIX are equity ETFs. BCFN charges 0.80% a year and CLIX 0.65%. The main difference: BCFN follows a active selection strategy; CLIX uses inverse.
- BCFN follows a active selection strategy; CLIX uses inverse.
- BCFN covers global markets; CLIX covers North America.
- CLIX costs 0.15% less per year.
- BCFN is much larger than CLIX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | CLIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $7M |
| Since | 2019 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.01% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -73.21% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.