Screener
BCFN vs LRGC
Baron Financials ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Key differences
- LRGC costs 0.41% less per year.
- LRGC is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCFN follows a index tracking strategy; LRGC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | LRGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2019 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +25.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.03% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -19.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and LRGC
Explore further