Screener
BCPL vs CGCP
BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF vs Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
Key differences
- CGCP costs 0.06% less per year.
- CGCP is significantly larger than BCPL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCPL covers north america markets; CGCP covers global.
- BCPL follows a index tracking strategy; CGCP uses active selection.
- BCPL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCPL | CGCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $313M | $7.6B |
| Since | 2012 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.86% | 5.14% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.74% |
| Max drawdown | -2.95% | -15.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCPL and CGCP
Explore further