Screener
BCTK vs IGM
Baron Technology ETF vs iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Key differences
- IGM costs 0.36% less per year.
- IGM is significantly larger than BCTK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCTK | IGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $165M | $9.5B |
| Since | 2021 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +55.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +39.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +21.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 20.24% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -40.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCTK and IGM
Explore further