Screener
BFLX vs FFDI
iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Developed
Key differences
- BFLX costs 0.15% less per year.
- BFLX follows a active selection strategy; FFDI uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFLX | FFDI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $22M |
| Since | 2026 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +12.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.99% |
| Max drawdown | 0.00% | -14.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFLX and FFDI
Explore further