Screener
BFOR vs GLOF
Barron's 400 ETF vs iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.45% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, GLOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $196M |
| Since | 2013 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 1.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 12.58% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and GLOF
Explore further