Screener
BILD vs IGF
Nomura Global Listed Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
Both BILD and IGF are equity ETFs. BILD charges 0.50% a year and IGF 0.39%. The main difference: IGF costs 0.11% less per year.
- IGF costs 0.11% less per year.
- IGF is much larger than BILD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BILD | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $10.6B |
| Since | 2023 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.84% | 2.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.8% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.83% | 10.55% |
| Max drawdown | -14.78% | -42.11% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.