Screener
BILD vs RIFR
Nomura Global Listed Infrastructure ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
Both BILD and RIFR are equity ETFs. BILD charges 0.50% a year and RIFR 0.59%. The main difference: BILD follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
- BILD follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
- BILD costs 0.09% less per year.
- RIFR is much larger than BILD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BILD | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $41M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.84% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.8% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.83% | 10.59% |
| Max drawdown | -14.78% | -6.80% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.