Screener
BILT vs INRO
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF vs iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- INRO costs 0.18% less per year.
- BILT follows a active selection strategy; INRO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BILT | INRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.42% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $31M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.69% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.92% |
| Max drawdown | -5.38% | -20.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BILT and INRO
Explore further