Screener
BILT vs SECU
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF vs iShares Securitized Income Active ETF
Key differences
- SECU costs 0.20% less per year.
- SECU is significantly larger than BILT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BILT is classified as equity, while SECU is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BILT follows a active selection strategy; SECU uses multi strategy.
- SECU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BILT | SECU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $592M |
| Since | 2025 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.99% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -5.38% | -1.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BILT and SECU
Explore further