Screener
BINC vs JPLD
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs Limited Duration Bond ETF
Key differences
Both BINC and JPLD are fixed income ETFs. BINC charges 0.40% a year and JPLD 0.24%. The main difference: BINC follows a active selection strategy; JPLD uses index tracking.
- BINC follows a active selection strategy; JPLD uses index tracking.
- JPLD costs 0.16% less per year.
- BINC is much larger than JPLD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- JPLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BINC | JPLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.8B | $3.8B |
| Since | 2023 | 1993 |
| Dividend yield | 5.54% | 4.21% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.4% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.28% | 1.47% |
| Max drawdown | -2.69% | -1.17% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.