Screener
BINV vs ACSV
Brandes International ETF vs American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF
Key differences
- ACSV costs 0.21% less per year.
- BINV is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BINV covers global markets; ACSV covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| BINV | ACSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $482M | $12M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.08% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.97% | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.91% | -7.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BINV and ACSV
Explore further