Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BITC vs YBTC

Bitwise Trendwise Bitcoin and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF vs Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF

BITC

Bitwise Trendwise Bitcoin and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF

Annual cost

0.88%

Fund size

$16M

YBTC

Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$152M

Key differences

BITC is a fixed income ETF, while YBTC is an alternative ETF. BITC charges 0.88% a year and YBTC 0.95%.

  • BITC is a fixed income fund, while YBTC is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • BITC follows a systematic alpha strategy; YBTC uses option income.
  • BITC covers global markets; YBTC covers North America.
  • BITC costs 0.07% less per year.
  • YBTC is much larger than BITC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

BITCYBTC
Annual cost (TER)0.88%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$16M$152M
Since20232024
Dividend yield3.14%77.86%
Asset classfixed incomealternative
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategysystematic alphaoption income
CAGR 1Y-15.1%-35.2%
CAGR 3Y+36.7%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.86N/A
Volatility 1Y25.54%39.95%
Max drawdown-31.89%-48.82%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BITC and YBTC