Screener
BLCR vs CCOR
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- BLCR costs 0.93% less per year.
- BLCR is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BLCR is classified as equity, while CCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BLCR covers global markets; CCOR covers north america.
- BLCR follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCR | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $28M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.24% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.4% | -4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.61% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -21.29% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BLCR and CCOR
Explore further