Screener
BLCV vs SVAL
iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF vs iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- SVAL costs 0.26% less per year.
- BLCV follows a active selection strategy; SVAL uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCV | SVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $317M | $188M |
| Since | 2023 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 2.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.8% | +36.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.64% | 18.05% |
| Max drawdown | -13.44% | -27.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BLCV and SVAL
Explore further