Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BUSA vs DFAS

Brandes U.S. Value ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF

BUSA

Brandes U.S. Value ETF

Brandes

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$292M

DFAS

Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF

Dimensional Fund Advisors

Annual cost

0.26%

Fund size

$14.0B

Key differences

  • DFAS costs 0.34% less per year.
  • DFAS is significantly larger than BUSA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BUSADFAS
Annual cost (TER)0.60%0.26%
Fund size (AUM)$292M$14.0B
Since20231998
Dividend yield1.48%0.94%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+23.9%+28.6%
CAGR 3YN/A+15.9%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A0.67
Volatility 1Y11.96%16.89%
Max drawdown-14.19%-26.13%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BUSA and DFAS