Screener
CCOR vs CBOX
Core Alternative ETF vs Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF
Key differences
Both CCOR and CBOX are alternative ETFs. CCOR charges 1.29% a year and CBOX 0.14%. The main difference: CCOR follows a option income strategy; CBOX uses active selection.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; CBOX uses active selection.
- CBOX costs 1.15% less per year.
- CBOX is much larger than CCOR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | CBOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $939M |
| Since | 2017 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | -1.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.18% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -2.90% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.