Screener
CCOR vs CBXA
Core Alternative ETF vs Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Struc
Key differences
CCOR is an alternative ETF, while CBXA is a cryptocurrency ETF. CCOR charges 1.29% a year and CBXA 0.69%.
- CCOR is an alternative fund, while CBXA is a cryptocurrency fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; CBXA uses active selection.
- CBXA costs 0.60% less per year.
- CCOR is much larger than CBXA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | CBXA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $4M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 2.36% |
| Asset class | alternative | cryptocurrency |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.5% | -21.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -1.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.18% | 18.12% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -28.98% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.