Screener
CCOR vs DFAX
Core Alternative ETF vs Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
Key differences
- DFAX costs 1.01% less per year.
- DFAX is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR is classified as alternative, while DFAX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; DFAX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DFAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | DFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $11.5B |
| Since | 2017 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 2.30% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | +35.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 14.74% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -28.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and DFAX
Explore further