Screener
CCOR vs RULE
Core Alternative ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
- CCOR costs 0.55% less per year.
- CCOR is classified as alternative, while RULE is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; RULE uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $14M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | +41.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 19.69% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -30.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and RULE
Explore further