Screener
CDC vs CFA
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF vs VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, CFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CDC | CFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $737M | $532M |
| Since | 2014 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.08% | 1.25% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +14.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.2% | +14.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.85% | 10.91% |
| Max drawdown | -21.37% | -37.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CDC and CFA
Explore further