Screener
CEFS vs CGSD
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF vs Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
- CGSD costs 2.36% less per year.
- CGSD is significantly larger than CEFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CEFS is classified as alternative, while CGSD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, CEFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CEFS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEFS | CGSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.61% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $402M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.92% | 1.46% |
| Max drawdown | -38.99% | -1.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEFS and CGSD
Explore further