Screener
CGBL vs QTAC
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF vs Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF
Key differences
CGBL is a mixed asset ETF, while QTAC is an alternative ETF. CGBL charges 0.33% a year and QTAC 1.78%.
- CGBL is a mixed asset fund, while QTAC is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- CGBL follows a active selection strategy; QTAC uses multi strategy.
- CGBL costs 1.45% less per year.
- CGBL is much larger than QTAC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGBL | QTAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 1.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.7B | $59M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.86% | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.66% | -16.56% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.