Screener
CGMU vs APCB
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF vs ActivePassive Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 0.09% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than APCB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGMU follows a index tracking strategy; APCB uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGMU | APCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.8B | $919M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.35% | 4.15% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.18 | 0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.28% | 3.47% |
| Max drawdown | -4.10% | -6.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGMU and APCB
Explore further