Screener
CGVV vs BUSA
Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF vs Brandes U.S. Value ETF
Key differences
- CGVV costs 0.27% less per year.
- CGVV follows a index tracking strategy; BUSA uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGVV | BUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $128M | $292M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.96% |
| Max drawdown | -10.11% | -14.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGVV and BUSA
Explore further