Screener
CLIX vs BCFN
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF vs Baron Financials ETF
Key differences
Both CLIX and BCFN are equity ETFs. CLIX charges 0.65% a year and BCFN 0.80%. The main difference: CLIX follows a inverse strategy; BCFN uses active selection.
- CLIX follows a inverse strategy; BCFN uses active selection.
- CLIX covers North America; BCFN covers global markets.
- CLIX costs 0.15% less per year.
- BCFN is much larger than CLIX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLIX | BCFN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $47M |
| Since | 2017 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | inverse | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.01% | — |
| Max drawdown | -73.21% | -20.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.