Screener
CLIX vs FFLS
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF vs The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Key differences
CLIX is an equity ETF, while FFLS is an alternative ETF. CLIX charges 0.65% a year and FFLS 1.60%.
- CLIX is an equity fund, while FFLS is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- CLIX follows a inverse strategy; FFLS uses long short.
- CLIX costs 0.95% less per year.
- FFLS is much larger than CLIX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CLIX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLIX | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 1.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $43M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.12% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.5% | -2.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.01% | 9.22% |
| Max drawdown | -73.21% | -11.05% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.