Screener
CLIX vs IWL
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
Both CLIX and IWL are equity ETFs. CLIX charges 0.65% a year and IWL 0.15%. The main difference: CLIX follows a inverse strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
- CLIX follows a inverse strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
- IWL costs 0.50% less per year.
- IWL is much larger than CLIX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLIX | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2017 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.5% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.8% | +14.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.01% | 12.51% |
| Max drawdown | -73.21% | -32.71% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.