Screener
CLIX vs RTH
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF vs VanEck Retail ETF
Key differences
Both CLIX and RTH are equity ETFs. CLIX charges 0.65% a year and RTH 0.35%. The main difference: CLIX follows a inverse strategy; RTH uses index tracking.
- CLIX follows a inverse strategy; RTH uses index tracking.
- RTH costs 0.30% less per year.
- RTH is much larger than CLIX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, CLIX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RTH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLIX | RTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $253M |
| Since | 2017 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.5% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.8% | +9.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.01% | 12.08% |
| Max drawdown | -73.21% | -25.00% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.