Screener
CTAP vs SPYC
Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF vs Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF
Key differences
- CTAP follows a managed futures strategy; SPYC uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTAP | SPYC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.53% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $100M |
| Since | — | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.92% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | managed futures | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +16.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.75% |
| Max drawdown | -9.02% | -28.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTAP and SPYC
Explore further