Screener
CTEX vs SMN
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF vs ProShares UltraShort Materials
Key differences
Both CTEX and SMN are equity ETFs. CTEX charges 0.58% a year and SMN 0.95%. The main difference: CTEX follows a index tracking strategy; SMN uses inverse.
- CTEX follows a index tracking strategy; SMN uses inverse.
- CTEX costs 0.37% less per year.
- Over the last three years, CTEX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTEX | SMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $3M |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | 4.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +126.4% | -24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.9% | -17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.41 | -0.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | 43.31% | 34.16% |
| Max drawdown | -70.30% | -95.39% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.